Editorials and Articles Archive

Misery Loves Company

American Idol, Human Nature, and the "Sesame Street Effect"

Stop us if you've heard this one.  Two men are walking through the African grasslands when suddenly they see a hungry cheetah, teeth bared and headed straight for them.  Their guns are broken, and they have no place to take cover.  Both men drop to their knees – one to pray, the other to tighten the laces on his sneakers.  The first guy says to the second, "What are you doing, you idiot?  You'll never be able to outrun that cheetah!"  And the second guy replies calmly, "I don't have to outrun the cheetah.  I just have to outrun you."

(* rimshot! *)  Thank you, thank you, we're here all week, and please don't forget to tip your waitress.  But seriously folks, this ancient joke has a connection to American Idol, particularly in the wake of the stunning results from Andrew Lloyd Webber Night.  Jason Castro and Brooke White, who delivered a pair of 1-star clunkers, were sent to safety early, thus allowing Syesha Mercado and Carly Smithson to set a new WNTS.com record they surely wanted no part of.  The two ladies made up the Bottom Two/Three with the highest average performance rating, 74.0, in the show's history.  (The previous record holders were a threesome from AI3 you might remember:  Fantasia Barrino, LaToya London, and Jennifer Hudson, at 69.3.)

Afterwards, the Idolsphere got together and calmly asked each other, "WHAT THE #*%&^ JUST HAPPENED??!"  To which we reply: Such language!  What would your mother say?  Here, take this bar of soap and go wash out your mouth, then have a seat in the corner with your blankie.  You'll need to regress to your childhood days to understand the common Idol voting phenomenon that just transpired, one we've dubbed The Sesame Street Effect.

The Monster In The Mirror

The Sesame Street Effect works like this.  Imagine a Finals episode in which two popular contestants both happen to deliver train-wreck performances on the same night.  Now it comes time to vote.  Ernie's loyal fans reason, "OK, he was bad, but Bert wasn't any better, and Ernie so deserves not to go home before Bert!!"  Thus, they dial and text for two solid hours.  Bert's fans, of course, reason exactly the same way.  One night later, Bert and Ernie are both safe, and America waves goodbye to Kermit.

The Effect is actually quite a reliable voting predictor.  In one form or another, it explains many of the most shocking eliminations over the years.  It's a by-product of American Idol's ladder-elimination format, its unlimited voting system, and basic human nature.

Let's start our study by seeing if you're smarter than a first grader.  The subject is Math.  On what percentage of American Idol episodes, do you suppose, is the contestant who delivered the lowest-rated performance of the night also the one who happens to be sent home by the voters?  To keep things simple, we'll limit this to Finals (not Semifinals or Wildcard) episodes where each contestant performs just one song.  Lock in your guess:  is it  A. 65%,  B. 55%,  C. 45%,  or D. 35%?

The correct answer is...E. 24%.  That wasn't one of the choices, you scream?  Too bad – Fox's business model revolves around embarrassing average Americans on national TV.  Take full credit if you guessed 35%, the closest option.  But in fact, in the 41 episodes that meet the criteria (we won't count AI2's Final Nine or AI6's Idol Gives Back, when no one was eliminated), the contestant who delivered the lowest-rated performance was dismissed just 10 times.

Why is this percentage so low?  We think the answer is obvious:  fans of the lowest-rated contestant usually recognize that their boy or girl is in trouble, and they vote like crazy to save them.  We've termed this the Mighty Mouse Effect, after the old cartoon superhero whose motto was "Here I come to save the day!"  (Yes, we watched way too much TV growing up.  Sue us.)

Rating Rank Eliminations Pct.
Lowest 10 24%
2nd-Lowest 12 29%
3rd-Lowest 7 17%
4th-Lowest 9 22%
Other 3 7%

The chart at right shows the distribution of eliminations to reverse order of approval ratings.  As you see, thanks to the Mighty Mouse Effect, it's statistically most dangerous to produce the second-lowest-rated performance of the night.  If you do, you'll find yourself singing at the close of the Results Show roughly three times in ten.  Note, though, that America does manage to send home one of the Lowest Two more than 50% of the time.  Not great, but not bad.

But what happens if both of the Lowest Two happen to be well below the third-lowest singer of the night, making it clear to all that one or the other deserves to go?  That's when Mighty Mouse and Super Grover join forces.  Not only do their fans rally to save them, but they have a powerful added incentive: they sense weakness in another contestant.  Ernie doesn't have to outrun the cheetah.  He only has to outrun Bert.

It's Not Easy Being Green

Of the 41 episodes under discussion, we've identified 13 in which the Lowest Two either truly stunk out the joint compared to the other contestants, or when they both delivered performances abnormally below their usual standards.  Let's look at how the voting transpired, and who played the role of Kermit on those fateful nights.  (A green check mark means that neither of the Lowest Two went home; a red X means one or the other did.)

  • n/a  AI2 Final 9
    As we said, this one doesn't count, but it's still interesting to see the earliest dress rehearsal of The Effect.  Rickey Smith and Josh Gracin both unexpectedly turned in big-time duds: Smith's Let's Groove at 18, Gracin's Celebration at 8.  The disqualification of Corey Clark's meant that nobody was sent home, but Ryan did announce the Bottom Three vote-getters the next night.  Neither Smith nor Gracin was in it.
  • Yes AI3 Final 10
    The official Opening Night for the Sesame Street Effect:  John Stevens (My Girl, 4) and Camile Velasco (For Once In My Life, 19) both delivered painful 1-star performances.  America was horrified the next day to learn that neither teen even made the Bottom Three:  Amy Adams was the one dismissed, over Hudson and London.
  • No AI3 Final 9
    Ernie and Bert outdid themselves the following week with two legendary train wrecks: Stevens's Crocodile Rock at 9, followed immediately by Velasco's Goodbye Yellow Brick Road at 6.  (Idol legends aren't necessarily heroic ones.)  The Effect couldn't perform its magic for the same two contestants two weeks in a row:  Velasco was sent home the next evening.
  • Yes AI3 Final 7
    The Effect claims its most famous victim.  George Huff, fighting laryngitis for the second straight week, barely croaked out Tryin' To Get The Feeling Again (17).  Stevens, who was coming off his lone 4-star performance, produced a passable but forgettable Mandy (31).  The other five contestants were all comfortably above 50.  The thought of the much-loved Huff going home before Stevens (who, in all fairness, had outsung Huff handily two weeks in a row, a fact that his online supporters were quick to point out) was more than the Idolsphere could bear.  With cries of "Save George!" echoing on boards and blogs across America, millions of voters frantically did exactly that.  But those votes had to come from somewhere, and it was from the most logical source:  the other three R&B contestants.  London, Barrino and the truly luckless Hudson never knew what hit them as they sat on their lily pads.
  • No AI4 Final 12
    Only Oscar The Grouch could love the Finals-opening performances by Mikalah Gordon (Son Of A Preacher Man, 9) and Lindsay Cardinale (Knock On Wood, 13), who finished more than 20 points behind the rest of the field.  As it was still early in the competition and the fanbases hadn't fully formed yet, both wound up in the Bottom Three the next night, with Cardinale sent home.  Score one against The Effect.
  • Yes AI4 Final 10
    Scott Savol and Anwar Robinson had scored respectably every week until now, but they hit bottom together with One Last Cry (11) and I Believe I Can Fly (22).  Both fanbases rose to their first challenge, resulting in Jessica Sierra, the fourth-lowest scorer, being sent home.
  • Yes AI4 Final 9
    Another episode that featured two legendary disasters: Savol's The Impossible Dream at 9, and Anthony Fedorov's surreal Climb Ev'ry Mountain at 10.  Third-lowest Nikko Smith was the predictable victim, despite scoring 27 points higher.
  • Yes AI5 Final 12
    Melissa's the one on the left.Another Finals opener that featured a pair of 1-star performances, this time from Kellie Pickler (Blame It On The Sun, 17) and Kevin Covais (Part-Time Lover, 13).  Melissa McGhee (who, coincidentally, looks a remarkable lot like Prairie Dawn, see right) was sent home.  We consider this one a marginal case, because neither McGhee nor Ace Young rated out a whole lot higher than Pickler and Covais, but we decided to count it because the latter two weren't even in the voters' Bottom Three.
  • No AI5 Final 9
    If there was ever a night made for the Sesame Street Effect, it was this one.  The Lowest Two by a wide margin were two popular front-runners, Taylor Hicks (Take Me Home Country Roads, 18) and Mandisa (Any Man Of Mine, 22).  Hicks avoided the Bottom Three, but Mandisa was indeed voted off Idol Island.  We suspect the reason had much to do with some controversial religious comments she had made to the press earlier in the week, but nonetheless it counts as a "miss" for The Effect.
  • Yes AI5 Final 8
    It didn't take long for the Muppets to bounce back.  Queen Night brought six above-average ratings and two below:  Young's We Will Rock You at 11 and Pickler's Bohemian Rhapsody at 38.  The latter rating might seem surprisingly high considering how the performance was (and still is) vilified on many blogs, but in reality most reviewers that night found it to be decent, if a little corny.  Pickler's fans, however, were fearful of the way-out-of-character performance and announced they'd be voting with their fingers and toes.  It worked:  Bucky Covington was sent home despite a solid 51 rating.
  • No AI6 Final 7
    We debated whether or not to draw any cases from Season Six, because even Sesame Street can't touch the phenomenon that was Sanjayamania.  But, since we counted a marginal "yes" earlier, we felt we should count a marginal "no" to be fair.  A lot of external factors were in play on this difficult night, which took place a day after the Virginia Tech massacre.  But if we look only at raw numbers, Chris Richardson (Mayberry, 17) and Sanjaya Malakar (Something To Talk About, 7) were the lowest two by a decent margin, which certainly meets our criteria.  Malakar was eliminated.
  • Yes AI7 Final 12
    The Season Seven Finals opener seemed to be cruising to one of the highest episode ratings ever when, like a bolt out of the blue, the final two singers both laid eggs.  Kristy Lee Cook's country-fair Eight Days A Week and David Archuleta's memory-mangled We Can Work It Out came in at 6 and 18 respectively.  That spelled doom for the third-lowest rated performer of the night, David Hernandez, even though we don't recall Bob and Big Bird ever singing about Hernandez's occupation in "The People In Your Neighborhood."
  • Yes AI7 Final 8
    The Lowest Two on this night weren't as weak as in some others, but their identities were definitely a shock:  David Cook (Innocent, 24) and Smithson (The Show Must Go On, 22).  Neither had previously dropped below 50, so their fanbases were fresh and ready to ride to the rescue.  In fact, the Lowest Four all turned in their worst ratings of the season to this point, so the fifth-lowest contestant unexpectedly said g'day:  Michael Johns.
  • Yes AI7 Final 6
    "Two of these things are not like the others...." Castro and White delivered back-to-back bombs: Memory at 15, and You Must Love Me at 14.  Neither had been anywhere close to 1-star before, and the other four contestants were all at 50 or above.  Smithson, who'd been on the winning side of The Effect just two weeks earlier, was on the losing end this time despite a 70-rated performance.

One final point before we tally the results.  We didn't count the AI5 Final 10, in which three contestants famously turned in a 1-star disaster, because it was outside our target group.  We were looking only for cases in which exactly two contestants' fanbases recognized that their favorites were in the most trouble.  If Elmo happens to turn in a stinker along with Ernie and Bert, all bets are off.  Fortunately for all of us, that very rarely happens.

Ready for the final tally?  Of the 41 episodes in the study, the Sesame Street Effect was fully or partly in play on 13.  On those, one of the Lowest Two went home four times; that's 31%.  In the other 28 shows, one of the Lowest Two went home 18 times; that's 64%.  Forty-one trials isn't enough to draw firm conclusions, only to observe trends.  Still, it seems as though American Idol is one of the few places on earth where if two people snooze, neither one is likely to lose.

(Late breaking news:  Since this article was originally published, we heard from readers who felt that we overlooked a few "hits," plus one obvious "miss".  One that we agree deserves to be in the Hit column is the AI2 Final 8, where neither Caldwell nor Carmen Rasmusen got above 16 and Smith, third-lowest at 46, was sent home.  That omission was a garden-variety brain cramp on our part.  On the other hand, we consciously decided not to count as a Miss the AI6 Final 12, in which Malakar and Brandon Rogers both were in the 1-star range and Rogers was eliminated.  But upon further review, that episode occurred one week before Sanjayamania truly took off with You Really Got Me, so we'll give it an X after all.  The changes don't affect the Effect's tally very much: instead of 31% to 64%, it's now 33% to 65%.  Carry on.)

Sunny Day, Sweepin' The Clouds Away...

So what can be done to fix the problem?  The producers' response might be: "Problem?  What problem??"  Remember, to them Idol is neither a singing competition nor a sporting event.  It's an extended, televised focus group study, nothing more and nothing less.  If a contestant has a fanbase that will stay fiercely loyal through good performances and bad, so much the better.  It suggests they'll probably stay loyal through his ups and downs as a recording artist, too.  For further study, see the career of Clay Aiken.

It should also be noted that none of the Effect's victims were likely to win the title.  That includes Hudson, Johns, and Smithson.  The producers probably don't care very much in what order the contestants finish.  They only seek to identify the ones who have staying power.  Had Archuleta been caught in the Effect's backdraft last week (and we suspect he wasn't as far off as many would guess) it would certainly have caught the bosses' attention.  As it is, it's just another bump in the road to the inevitable David-vs.-David Finale.

The Effect is much more of an issue to us viewers, who do see the show as more of a sporting event, and to whom the order in which the contestants finish does matter.  Recognizing that the root of the problem lies in the voting system, many people across the Idolsphere have proposed sweeping changes over the years.  We'll take a look at them more closely in next week's essay, and we'll even make a modest proposal of our own that might satisfy both the producers' agenda and the fans'.  In the meantime, we gotta go; there's this cheetah we have to outrun....

Epilogue: The Extended Neighborhood

Since this article first appeared in April of 2008, we've come to realize that the Sesame Street Effect is more prevalent than we originally thought.  We'd concentrated only on those situations in which two contestants sang abysmally on the same night.  Perhaps in the olden days of American Idol, when disastrous performances were more common, bad singing was the primary trigger of the Effect.

Today, however, we recognize multiple train wreckage as special cases of a more general rule:  The Sesame Street Effect applies whenever the voters perceive that the "real" decision on the night is which contestant ought to go home, not which ones ought to stay.  In other words, if a show's circumstances make it obvious that one of two contestants deserves a dismissal, the voters will cast their ballots so that their voices are heard on that case.  Then, the Effect will do what it usually does: inflate Ernie and Bert's vote totals so that they're swept to safety past Kermit, the lowest vote getter among the Should Be Safe contingent.

One famous episode in which both Ernie and Bert sang well is the AI6 Final ThreeMelinda Doolittle's record-setting approval rating suggested that the voters assumed, rightly or wrongly, that she was a lock for the Finale.  The decision was widely perceived to be who should join her: Blake Lewis or Jordin Sparks, both of whom had sung perfectly decently that night and throughout the season.  The Effect was nonetheless triggered, and Doolittle, who hadn't been in the Bottom Three all year, was sent home a night later.

Another trainwreck-free case occurred the night of the AI8 Final Five.  All five contestants had sung very well in one of the highest-rated episodes ever.  It was almost universally assumed that Adam Lambert and Danny Gokey were safe, particularly since the judges had anointed both as the likely Finale duo most of the season.  Voters thus naturally believed they were being called upon to decide who should go among the other three finalists, particularly Allison Iraheta and Matt Giraud, both of whom were no strangers to the Bottom Three.  The next night, Iraheta and Gokey were safe, while Lambert and Kris Allen made their only Bottom Three appearances.  Giraud, however, was simply too far behind the Top 4 to catch a Kermit.  (Two weeks later, still twitching over this close call and haunted by Doolittle's elimination, Simon Cowell practically got down on his hands and knees and begged viewers not to assume that Lambert was safe at the end of the AI8 Final Three.)

Whatever its cause, the Effect is a side-effect of a badly broken voting system that assumes that people will vote for one or two favorite contestants they want to keep, week in and week out.  That naively ignores the fact that Idol fans do care in what order the contestants go home, even when they realize that the singers in question have no business winning the title.  As long as the producers give America two completely different jobs to do, but only one tool to do them with, the Sesame Street Effect will always be with us.

- The WNTS.com Team

[ Back to Editorial List ]
WhatNotToSing.com copyright © 2007-2023, The WNTS Team.  All rights reserved.  Use of this website implies that you accept our Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy.  American Idol is a registered trademark of 19 TV Ltd.  We are not affiliated in any way with American Idol, Fox Television, FremantleMedia North America, or any of their parent or subsidiary companies.